For example, the tank chase in GoldenEye, construction site parkour chase in Casino Royale, and helicopter fight at the opening in Spectre. on the other hand Daniel Craig gave a great performance, the action scenes were great and the cinematography was fantastic so there's tradeoffs each wayįor me, the thing that felt off to me from this movie was how a lot of the action scenes involved a lot more shootouts or fights in closed spaces rather than the big budget sequences the other films would typically have.
Then there were the grating side characters that I really didn't enjoy all that much, plus some weak dialogue too.įinally looking back I feel like there's a few plot holes that weren't addressed that would have allowed Bond to survive and live with his family.Įh whatever. then in this film the villain (Who is so plain that I don't even remember his name) manages to destroy that Spectre with pretty much no set up whatsoever. Especially given how Bond to Bond transitions previously didn't rely on him dying so why now?Īlso it had a pretty weak villain and I think in particular a whole film was dedicated to how dangerous Spectre was and how it has agents everywhere. I think because the ending really didn't need to be what it was, Bond didn't HAVE to die, it was just there to screw with the audience to 'subvert expectations'.
0 kommentar(er)
